ColdFusion Muse

A vote for OpenBSD - the Data Center Workhorse

Mark Kruger July 12, 2005 10:55 AM Hosting and Networking Comments (3)

Last year we had consolidated all our servers into a single data center. We were faced with a choice for setting up new DNS server. Our current DNS server (at the time) was RedHat Linux, but it did not belong to us. We used it at our previous "shared" space for DNS and email Relay. We had sufficient hardware for a new box - but we weren't altogether satisfied with the Redhat box. It seemed like we had to patch it quite frequently, and the features seemed like overkill for DNS and Email Relay. As a part of our migration we were fortunate to hire into an outstanding Cisco and networking consultant named Jeff Zimmerman (jdzimme@suretytek.com). Jeff not only "fixes" our stuff but he "teaches us to fish". He's a great knowledge sharer and is very responsive. He recommended we switch to OpenBSD. His take was that it was designed with security and stability the top priority. He said it would run forever and we would never notice it.

After 3 months I'd have to say he was spot on in his assessment. The servers have not had any issues. We installed BIND, Sendmail and webmin. Webmin was for me - I hate telnet (ha). There are some gotchas. The install program was written by Koko the Gorilla (on a bad hair day). The configuration tools and interfaces aren't intuitive or sexy. In fact I'd say they are designed to be as "un-sexy" as possible. If you look in the dictionary under "unattractive" I think you would find "see OpenBSD". But besides being the pinnacle of geekdom, the OS works as advertised and does not require attention. In fact, I can safely say now that the biggest issue with OpenBSD is that it requires so little attention we run the risk of forgetting what we've learned about it.

  • Share:

3 Comments

  • Brandon Harper's Gravatar
    Posted By
    Brandon Harper | 7/12/05 11:00 AM
    When I first tried OpenBSD years and years ago, it was so stripped down that I wasn't sure what to do with it once the install was done (and I'd been using Linux and FreeBSD for at least a couple of years). I need to give it a try again sometime (it would make a good home firewall for instance).

    For the most part I stick to FreeBSD though... I just wish there were some way to get some sort of limited "free" version of ColdFusion/BlueDragon or some other CFML server for J2EE to use on my FreeBSD server for a personal site or some such. Until then, I'll stick to the free stuff (PHP, JSP, etc).

    BTW, no one uses telnet on servers any more, it's all SSH. I also think the only way to teach yourself Unix is to start on a shell and not use X-Windows, but that's me. It's very much an OS for "power users".
  • Mkruger's Gravatar
    Posted By
    Mkruger | 7/12/05 11:08 AM
    You are right... I meant SSH. I use "absolute telnet" as a client so I think of it as telnet. But you can tell I'm not a linux/unix guy (ha). I agree with you about the shell usage though.
  • Bob Vlasak's Gravatar
    Posted By
    Bob Vlasak | 10/23/06 10:59 AM
    BlueDragon is offering a free base version of BlueDragon Server.

    "The BlueDragon ServerTM family of Java-based servers (Server and Server JX) enables the stand-alone deployment of CFML. Both BlueDragon Server versions contain a built-in web server for development and testing, and each integrates with Microsoft IIS, Sun ONE/Netscape/iPlanet (JX only), and Apache web servers for deployment.

    Looking to replace CFML with ASP or PHP due to budgetary reasons? Stick with CFML instead, and deploy with the base version of BlueDragon Server on Windows, Mac OS X or Linux platforms for FREE! BlueDragon Server includes support for CFCs, XML, Web Services, and Java and C++ CFX tags. Functionality is robust and useful for most CFML applications."

    http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/blue...